Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0476

reference
230-tree-1
name
0476
tree-preservation-order

undefined

230-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006344 50.853476)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006259 50.853466,-1.006262 50.853483,-1.006274 50.853498,-1.006293 50.853510,-1.006316 50.853518,-1.006343 50.853521,-1.006369 50.853519,-1.006393 50.853511,-1.006412 50.853499,-1.006425 50.853485,-1.006429 50.853468,-1.006425 50.853451,-1.006413 50.853436,-1.006395 50.853424,-1.006371 50.853416,-1.006345 50.853413,-1.006319 50.853416,-1.006295 50.853423,-1.006276 50.853435,-1.006263 50.853450,-1.006259 50.853466)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL